What’s With This Misplaced “Esquire” Mania?

photo

Lawyers in the U.S. have fallen in love with “Esquire”.  It is found appended everywhereon stationery mastheads and signatures, on business cards, professional listings, etc.  You name it–it’s there!  All well and good!  Right?  Not so fast!

But I digress.  Back to “Esquire.”  What’s the origin of the word?  How was–and is–it intended to be used?

Basically, Esquire is an honorific, usually in its abbreviated form (“Esq.”)  As set forth by the American Bar Association (where I worked for some years), in the roots of English law, it is a title of dignity belonging to the order of English gentry, next above “gentleman” and below a knight.  It applies to both male and female lawyers.

The term Esquire is firmly established in the U.S.  Indeed, I belong to three or four bar associations, all of which use the term in correspondence.  Even the New York State board regulating the profession which conferred my license to practice law has always addressed me as George M. Gold, Esq., in correspondence and various forms.  The word has a nice cachet to it.  And in the practice of law, I regularly addressed fellow attorneys as John Smith, Esq.–or the firm as Smith & Smith Esqs., when sending along pleadings and the like.

Incidentally, going beyond its use in the legal profession, at times it I simply used as a courtesy title, akin to Mr. or President.

Getting back to lawyers, as noted above, it is appropriate to use Esquire or Esq. in addressing attorney-recipients–e.g.,  to brethren, others, but not proper for senders to sign off with this title, e.g., from you.  It’s akin to using “Mr. Robert Brown” or “Ms. Jane Brown” in signing letters, or on business cards, in professional listings, as an author, on stationery mastheads, etc.  It is especially egregious when the communication has nothing to do with legal matters.  It could be a marketing brochure or related piece. When so used, it stresses the profession’s exclusivity; it helps to create the in-group feeling that lawyers are the chosen, and the rest of the world are the choosers.  It has a pompous quality that best be avoided. Stated simply, we’d best do without it.

Author’s NoteIn the spirit of full disclosure, I must admit a failing.  In changing my e-mail address some months ago, I learned that ggold or gmgold, was not available without a number–5 or 7–don’t remember which.  I don’t know what I was thinking at the time, but I inadvertently used gmgoldesq in the electronic signature.  It’s a hassle to change it, but I’m currently in the process of putting my money where my mouth–or pen—is.

All opinions, advice, and experiences of guest bloggers/columnists are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, practices or experiences of Solo Practice University®.

This entry was posted in Guest Bloggers, Subjective Opinions, The BS-Free Zone and tagged Esquire, George Gold. Bookmark the permalink.

Enjoy our blog posts with lunch! Enter your email address and we'll send you an email each time a new blog post is published.

Want your free copy of Business Call is Back and Attorney Guide to Virtual Receptionists? Subscribe by email below and you will be able to download them immediately.

5 comments on “What’s With This Misplaced “Esquire” Mania?

    • Teresa, I guess we don’t travel in the same circles. The improper use of Esquire is as prevalent in Texas–Houston, Dallas, Austin, Waco, Corpus, Waco, etc.–as it is in other regions. And as I notw, it is only a “lawyer thing” when addressing attorneys in writing–not from lawyers. You wouldn’t sign a letter or list a masthead as Mr, John Jones, or Ms. Sally Smith. Thanks for writing. George

  • “…it stresses the profession’s exclusivity; it helps to create the in-group feeling that lawyers are the chosen, and the rest of the world are the choosers. It has a pompous quality that best be avoided” Well stated! The last sentence this is why I’ve always avoided it, and kind of giggled when anybody under 70 used it. (folks over 70 can do what they want, I plan to! :-D ) I didn’t know the term it had come into vogue – I haven’t noticed an increase here in the PNW.

    • Teresa, I guess we don’t travel in the same circles. The improper use of Esquire is as prevalent in Texas–Houston, Dallas, Austin, Waco, Corpus, Waco, etc.–as it is in other regions. And as I notw, it is only a “lawyer thing” when addressing attorneys in writing–not from lawyers. You wouldn’t sign a letter or list a masthead as Mr, John Jones, or Ms. Sally Smith. Thanks for writing. George

  • Teresa, it’s everywhere–young barristers as well as older practitioners.. I commend to you my earlier blog contribution, “English: A Second Language for Lawyers.” Thanks for writing. George

Comments are closed automatically 60 days after the post is published.