e Latest Blog Post: Being a Lawyer Is Not Worth Sacrificing Your Life — Read

7 Comments

  1. This was a really interesting post. I have also cited to Lady Gaga in a presentation, though as an example of someone who is passionate about her work.

    Having said that, I have to admit that Gaga’s whole fan thing is an enormous turn off to me personally. When I first read about it and saw some of the blog posts on this topic (as great as this post is, it is not the first I’ve seen on this issue), I thought “Wow, this woman is a complete narcissist.” It was not until a few weeks later that I caught an interview of Gaga on one of the morning shows that my view changed – she came across as modest, very intelligent and committed to her work.

    Understandably, I am not in Gaga’s market demographic – I would never pay to go to a concert or even buy her songs (they are overplayed enough on radio). But my point is that you need to know and understand your target audience and further, not be bothered that those outside your target audience may find your “fan” message over the top or even offensive.

    • “…. It was not until a few weeks later that I caught an interview of Gaga on one of the morning shows that my view changed – she came across as modest, very intelligent and committed to her work.

      ….But my point is that you need to know and understand your target audience and further, not be bothered that those outside your target audience may find your “fan” message over the top or even offensive.”

      BINGO!! :-)

      I, too, am outside of her demographic (although, I confess I really like her music!). But I’ve heard the question too often ‘how does a lawyer really create ‘fans’ and capitalize upon this to build their practices?’ I think Dan nails it by showcasing how this powerhouse does just that. As you picked up, she’s a real person, intelligent, more than gets her audience and is very conscious of ’cause-marketing’…another lesson for lawyers, especially solo practitioners where it is so important to integrate our professional and personal lives in a way to keep sanity.

      There is a personal injury law firm in Connecticut (I’m sure there are more) which donates 10% of each contingency fee award to various charities they believe in. It’s smart. It takes the sting out of the greedy and overpaid image lawyers are yoked with and they can select charities which reflect their passions.

      There are many lessons to be learned!

  2. “Don’t be a afraid to make the world a better place. Use your influence as a legal professional responsibly and for causes you believe in. Stay true to your message, helping your clients and changing the world.”

    This is the best bit of professional advice I’ve heard thus far. It really hit home with me today as I use these last few months as a Law Clerk to contemplate and define what type of practice I want to build and what type of lawyer I want to be come September. I have always been a socially conscious person but have felt the need to give up my desire to help people somewhat in order to make a decent living and be an entrepeneur. This post seems to suggest that if you help people for free, you will find that you have more people to help for a profit. Awesome!!

    • Rachel,

      I’ll get Dan to jump in shortly :-) A big part of Lady Gaga’s success in social media comes from not trying to monetize what can already be had for free and instead being the one who gives it for free.

      Her money comes from music sales, concerts and more.

      As lawyers, 80% of legal information can be found on line. What can’t be found on line (for free) is representation and counsel. So why not deliver the information that can be sourced for free utilizing the internet and do so through effective use of social media? Let your marketing be cause-driven? Have fans who believe in what you are doing as a responsible professional?

      It’s a brave new world out there and even if others have been doing it quietly for decades (because cause-marketing is nothing new)..why not do it loudly and proudly and virally through social media platforms which present an unprecedented opportunity? And lawyers are no different no matter how hard some protest we are.

  3. I was fortunate enough to attend Dan’s presentation in person and the ONLY thing I disagree with what he’s written here is that it’s possible for anyone to have missed his point, if you were paying attention!

    Clearly, whether you engage in social media or not Dan’s observation is well-taken that clients don’t want to hire lawyers. They want to find solutions. And they prefer to get help with those solutions from persons of integrity and authenticity who “hear” them and engage in two-way dialogue such as Lady Gaga to her fans and Dan Perry to all of us.

    Incidentally it’s worth noting this marketing “strategy” was highly effective long before anyone ever coined the term ‘social media’ so let’s not dismiss the point just because some of us may not be as comfortable with twitter or facebook as others.

  4. Rachel:

    If you took from this blog post simply that Gaga is socially conscious and that if you help people for free “… that you have more people to help for a profit,” then you missed the main point of the post. For the most part, there is nothing unusual about Gaga’s philanthropic efforts. And it is frankly admirable, but pedestrian, that celebrities support charitable causes. It almost goes without saying that lawyers (and non-lawyers) should always support charitable causes. But the suggestion that helping charity might profit you at a later date simply perpetuates cynicism on several levels.

    The thing that distinguishes Gaga is not that she support causes. Nor is it that she has a platform to address her fans. What makes her so “authentic” to her fans is that she uses social media to converse with them. She is speaking in THEIR medium (the Internet) in a voice that THEY use about issues which her fans believe they SHARE. That her interaction resonates with them is what propels her to new stretches of her artistry. It is, in some sense, more than a conversation: it’s almost a dance.

    Finally, as for helping people for free, that is is a great gesture and, in fact, is the whole premise behind a book by noted web guru Chris Anderson titled: “Free – The Future of a Radical Price” http://www.longtail.com/ and a couple of Wikipedia entries: “Free – The Future of a Radical Price” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free:_The_Future_of_a_Radical_Price; and “Freemium” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemium. But, I cringe at the simplistic notion that I help people for free merely so I can profit later. Much information is already freely available from many varied sources. I want to be so helpful to my audience (fans if you will) that by solving a problem they have they won’t even think about going to my competition. In that sense, I render the competition to be irrelevant and nonexistent. Providing free information does a lot more than allow me to profit. It allows me to prove my relevance to my audience of fans. And it forces me to work harder to realize the value I bring to that relationship.

    By way of illustration, I recently had a potential client interview myself and several competing law firms. I told them that the best value I brought to the table was that they could see a date in the very near future when they would no longer need me. They were stunned by that statement but allowed me to explain the need for systems – which I could help them institute for a substantial fee – which would eventually sunset their need for my services.

    Daniel Perry
    Twitter: DanielPerry http://twitter.com/danielperry

  5. Fantastic article. Glad I took the time to read it, along with the comments.

    This really got me to thinking about the social media and it’s impact on my future practice.
    Thank you Dan for a very timely article.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Email
Print
WP Socializer Aakash Web